The permaculture workshop I attended on 29 October at Stanmer Park in the United Kingdom led me to think further about the future of a great regenerative development by the Brighton Permaculture Trust called the ‘scrumping project’.
On this last day of 2017, I am considering qualitative elements that can make (or break?) the success of a sustainable development initiative such as the scrumping project and its Fruit Factory by the Brighton Permaculture Trust in Sussex, United Kingdom.
As a former marketing professional I know the importance of brand names, and of the words that compose them. However ethical the scrumping project is, I wonder whether the word ‘scrumping’, as well as the brand ‘Scrumped’ on product labels serve this wonderful and effective initiative well.
My French culture probably makes me less at ease with playing with ambivalence and ambiguity than the British. But the English dictionaries are very clear: to scrump is to steal, for instance ‘to steal (fruit) from an orchard or garden’ in the Oxford Dictionaries, so there is not much ambiguity there.
Some may argue that so much fruit is going to waste that something needs to be done, should it involve picking without permission. I personally think asking permission to pick should be a matter of principle. Should words like scrumping be avoided in sustainable development activities?
How many people would be, like me, at least slightly put off by the word ‘scrumping’? This is where another argument comes into place.
On 29 October, I attended the ‘Taking Permaculture to the Edge’ workshop organised by the Brighton Permaculture Trust at the Fruit Factory in Stanmer Park. We had a great day discussing nearly forty years of permaculture and its future with Dr. Charlie Brennan, a social ecologist and renowned permaculturist with thirty years applied experience of ‘bringing land alive’ in particular in Australia where modern permaculture was born in 1978 with the publication of the book Permaculture 1 by Bill Mollison.
He wondered how permaculture could become more mainstream. For instance, he said how controversial and divisive a subject it was in the US. He cited Heidegger, saying that “fracture renders the familiar explicit”, suggesting that this divide had been good in making people see the limits of our current systems of food production. However, wasn’t it now time to make permaculture more consensual and accessible to a wider public?
Maybe is it also time to reconsider the name of the scrumping project to make it more consensual?
Thank you for this interesting article – yes, the word ‘scrumping’ has evolved to suggest theft, though it’s origin implies gleaning: ‘The source is uncertain but seems to be from a dialect term meaning something withered, shrivelled or dried up. It may be linked to the old adjective scrimp, scanty or meagre, from which we get the verb scrimp, to economise or be thrifty. Support for this comes from an early meaning of scrumping, which referred to taking windfalls or the small apples left on the trees after harvest.’ (http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-scr2.htm)
I looked up the word, because in British popular culture it has strong associations with childhood rural idylls – in my mind it is associated with picking up windfalls, rather than taking from the tree. The word itself is quite friendly and child-like. But given the fact that fruit as indeed been stolen wholesale from community orchards (this example a couple of months ago: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-sussex-41628541/apples-being-grown-for-food-banks-stolen), I can see your point!
Thank you Jac for these insights which show a more positive side of the word ‘scrumping’ in local speech, curiously absent from standard English dictionaries. Something to look further into, I think, as well as the issue of fruit stealing mentioned in your second link.